quantum foundations, quantum measurement and quantum engineering
אלי כהן
Identity: verifiedThe roster form אלי is treated as the familiar form of the official Bar-Ilan name אליהו/Eliahu Cohen; retain this mapping and reconfirm it if legal-name precision matters. [113][114]
Documented foundation
Bar-Ilan physicist working on quantum measurement, nonlocality and time, with the university describing links to sensing, imaging and quantum encryption.[113][114]
quantum measurement theorynonlocalityquantum timequantum sensing concepts
The university feature and research record establish role and work, but no standalone current CV was verified.[113][114]
Representative records, not a complete publication list. Metadata confirms attribution; it does not independently replicate a result.
2023 · paper
The institutional record attributes this conference article on quantum-clock uncertainty, non-Hermitian dynamics and temporal nonlocality solely to Eliahu Cohen.[114]
6 catalogued patent records · 6 identified families
Coverage: Partial inventor search
The quantum inventor index led to six inspected and attributable 2024–2025 publications, five with Bar-Ilan and Mellanox original-assignee fields and one Bar-Ilan high-photon-energy imaging application. Five additional indexed identifiers returned 404 from Google Patents and are not accepted from the index alone. Common Eli/Eliahu names and cited papers were not treated as inventor identity. Coverage is partial, including the 2026 frontier.
US20250373340A1 · Published 2025-12-04
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Bar Ilan University; Mellanox Technologies Ltd
The inspected inventor field names Eliahu Cohen. Quantum-imaging/communication subject, Bar-Ilan applicant context and recurring Elitzur/Idan/Shwartz co-inventors support the mapping to the Bar-Ilan quantum researcher; not to unrelated Eli/Eliahu Cohens. Assignee means the observed original-assignee field; no current ownership conclusion.[327]
US20250365149A1 · Published 2025-11-27
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Bar Ilan University; Mellanox Technologies Ltd
The inspected inventor field names Eliahu Cohen. Quantum-imaging/communication subject, Bar-Ilan applicant context and recurring Elitzur/Idan/Shwartz co-inventors support the mapping to the Bar-Ilan quantum researcher; not to unrelated Eli/Eliahu Cohens. Assignee means the observed original-assignee field; no current ownership conclusion.[326]
US20240296361A1 · Published 2024-09-05
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Bar Ilan University; Mellanox Technologies Ltd
The inspected inventor field names Eliahu Cohen. Quantum-imaging/communication subject, Bar-Ilan applicant context and recurring Elitzur/Idan/Shwartz co-inventors support the mapping to the Bar-Ilan quantum researcher; not to unrelated Eli/Eliahu Cohens. Assignee means the observed original-assignee field; no current ownership conclusion.[322]
US20240288595A1 · Published 2024-08-29
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Bar Ilan University
The inspected inventor field names Eliahu Cohen. Quantum-imaging/communication subject, Bar-Ilan applicant context and recurring Elitzur/Idan/Shwartz co-inventors support the mapping to the Bar-Ilan quantum researcher; not to unrelated Eli/Eliahu Cohens. Assignee means the observed original-assignee field; no current ownership conclusion.[321]
US20240232672A1 · Published 2024-07-11
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Bar Ilan University; Mellanox Technologies Ltd
The inspected inventor field names Eliahu Cohen. Quantum-imaging/communication subject, Bar-Ilan applicant context and recurring Elitzur/Idan/Shwartz co-inventors support the mapping to the Bar-Ilan quantum researcher; not to unrelated Eli/Eliahu Cohens. Assignee means the observed original-assignee field; no current ownership conclusion.[320]
US20240195834A1 · Published 2024-06-13
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Bar Ilan University; Mellanox Technologies Ltd
The inspected inventor field names Eliahu Cohen. Quantum-imaging/communication subject, Bar-Ilan applicant context and recurring Elitzur/Idan/Shwartz co-inventors support the mapping to the Bar-Ilan quantum researcher; not to unrelated Eli/Eliahu Cohens. Assignee means the observed original-assignee field; no current ownership conclusion.[319]
Original evidence: not verified
No attributable patent record was verified in the bounded search.
Records are counted separately from identified families. Author-reported entries are labelled and may still need publication verification. Inventorship, publication-time applicant and current ownership are different facts. No legal-status, patentability or freedom-to-operate conclusion is made.
Scores prioritize research fit from 1–10; they are not probabilities.
Review: Reviewed with limitations
Proposed capability matches, not confirmed relationships. Scores are analyst judgments with low forecast confidence; researcher interests, capacity and feasibility need confirmation.
10 candidates
Connection 1
Original proposal
Proposal hypothesis: Blau's quantum frequency transformations give Eliahu Cohen a concrete measurement system for testing distinguishability and uncertainty relations.[37][38][113][114]
Proposed first test: Simulate a three-mode transformation with detector loss and compare a proposed measurement statistic to a classical mixture control.
Rank 1/10; fit 8/10: topic overlap 3/4, complementarity 3/3, first-test feasibility 2/3. Original initiative connection retained. No higher-scoring new candidate displaces this original. Independent review lowered feasibility by one point: Three modes, detector loss and a classical-mixture control give a useful scaffold, but the proposed measurement statistic is unnamed. Define the witness/estimator and its output criterion, or score feasibility 2/3 rather than 3/3. Equal scores retain originals first, then stable profile order. The underlying capabilities and proposed first test explain the component judgments. Specific scientific limitation: The score reflects a tractable optical-theory test, not an established quantum advantage.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 2
Original proposal
Proposal hypothesis: Zektzer's atom-photon sensor platform and Eliahu Cohen's quantum measurement theory could identify when a proposed readout helps under realistic noise.[50][51][113][114]
Proposed first test: Model one atomic sensing sequence with and without the proposed readout and compare estimation error at equal photon budgets.
Rank 2/10; fit 8/10: topic overlap 3/4, complementarity 3/3, first-test feasibility 2/3. Original initiative connection retained. No higher-scoring new candidate displaces this original. Equal scores retain originals first, then stable profile order. The underlying capabilities and proposed first test explain the component judgments. Specific scientific limitation: A classical equal-resource comparator is essential; a conceptual correction may not survive device noise.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 3
Original proposal
Proposal hypothesis: Goldzak Mizrahi's microscopic material model and Eliahu Cohen's quantum-measurement theory can connect defect dynamics to a clearly defined observable.[113][114][132][133]
Proposed first test: For a small published defect model, compare a measurement prediction under two approximations and test against a classical/noise null.
Rank 3/10; fit 8/10: topic overlap 3/4, complementarity 3/3, first-test feasibility 2/3. Original initiative connection retained. No higher-scoring new candidate displaces this original. Equal scores retain originals first, then stable profile order. The underlying capabilities and proposed first test explain the component judgments. Specific scientific limitation: A bounded theory study is plausible; a jointly valid material and measurement model must be agreed before device conclusions.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 4
Proposal hypothesis: Fridman's temporal cavities provide a concrete optical system for Eliahu Cohen's questions about quantum time and measurement.[34][113][114]
Proposed first test: Compare a temporal-cavity model with classical and quantum input statistics at equal energy; quantify an explicitly chosen observable.
Rank 4/10; fit 8/10: topic overlap 3/4, complementarity 3/3, first-test feasibility 2/3. Added capability match outside the original initiative graph; prior collaboration or novelty was not established. Independent review lowered feasibility by one point: The temporal cavity and equal-energy comparison are plausible, but the test leaves the observable explicitly to be chosen. A 3/3 feasible-first-test score is premature until the measured quantity, quantum/classical input states and loss/noise model are fixed. The live Fridman page even lists joint quantum-temporal work, supporting topic fit without resolving this experimental specification. Equal scores retain originals first, then stable profile order. The underlying capabilities and proposed first test explain the component judgments. Specific scientific limitation: A temporal analogy alone does not establish quantum advantage.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 5
Original proposal
Proposal hypothesis: Panfil can specify emitter brightness and noise while Eliahu Cohen defines which quantum-measurement observable distinguishes it from a classical light source.[25][26][113][114]
Proposed first test: Model a photon-correlation measurement with background and detector noise; compare the quantum witness with a matched classical emitter model.
Rank 5/10; fit 7/10: topic overlap 2/4, complementarity 3/3, first-test feasibility 2/3. Original initiative connection retained. New candidate Moti Fridman ranks higher at 8/10 (overlap 3, complementarity 3, feasibility 2). Its proposed capability split: Proposal hypothesis: Fridman's temporal cavities provide a concrete optical system for Eliahu Cohen's questions about quantum time and measurement. Compare the cited first experiments; these are analyst priorities, not measured success rates. Equal scores retain originals first, then stable profile order. The underlying capabilities and proposed first test explain the component judgments. Specific scientific limitation: A quantum-measurement concept is not a demonstrated colloidal sensor; a concrete observable must precede hardware claims.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 6
Original proposal
Proposal hypothesis: Desiatov can parameterize an integrated nonlinear device while Eliahu Cohen specifies a falsifiable quantum-measurement benefit.[113][114][135][136]
Proposed first test: Compare quantum and classical probe models in one lossy converter at equal input energy; report sensitivity and the loss threshold for any gain.
Rank 6/10; fit 7/10: topic overlap 2/4, complementarity 3/3, first-test feasibility 2/3. Original initiative connection retained. New candidate Moti Fridman ranks higher at 8/10 (overlap 3, complementarity 3, feasibility 2). Its proposed capability split: Proposal hypothesis: Fridman's temporal cavities provide a concrete optical system for Eliahu Cohen's questions about quantum time and measurement. Compare the cited first experiments; these are analyst priorities, not measured success rates. Equal scores retain originals first, then stable profile order. The underlying capabilities and proposed first test explain the component judgments. Specific scientific limitation: Quantum-foundations expertise alone does not establish a fabrication-compatible sensing advantage.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 7
Proposal hypothesis: Eliahu Cohen can formalize a quantum measurement parameter and Amir Weiss can derive an estimator and classical comparison.[108][109][113][114]
Proposed first test: On a toy lossy sensing model, compare attainable estimation error for a proposed measurement with a matched classical estimator.
Rank 7/10; fit 7/10: topic overlap 2/4, complementarity 3/3, first-test feasibility 2/3. Added capability match outside the original initiative graph; prior collaboration or novelty was not established. Independent review lowered feasibility by one point: The toy lossy sensing model, estimated parameter and proposed quantum measurement are all unspecified. Equal-resource comparison is sound in principle, but the current prose does not justify maximum first-test feasibility. Equal scores retain originals first, then stable profile order. The underlying capabilities and proposed first test explain the component judgments. Specific scientific limitation: Statistical improvement must not be conflated with a general quantum advantage.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 8
Proposal hypothesis: Eliahu Cohen's measurement theory and Noam's estimation bounds could test a narrowly defined quantum-timing proposal.[113][114][130][131]
Proposed first test: Compare a quantum-clock timing model and classical timing noise at equal resources; report estimation-bound sensitivity to loss.
Rank 8/10; fit 7/10: topic overlap 2/4, complementarity 3/3, first-test feasibility 2/3. Added capability match outside the original initiative graph; prior collaboration or novelty was not established. Independent review lowered feasibility by one point: The cited quantum-clock abstract concerns Page-Wootters clock frames and foundational uncertainty, not an engineered timing sensor. Define how a specific clock state produces the timing likelihood/noise model before assigning maximum feasibility; keep the existing low topic-overlap score. Equal scores retain originals first, then stable profile order. The underlying capabilities and proposed first test explain the component judgments. Specific scientific limitation: No satellite quantum hardware or practical clock correction is established.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 9
Proposal hypothesis: Ozana can set realistic photon and motion noise limits for Eliahu Cohen's proposed quantum-sensing observable.[41][42][113][114]
Proposed first test: Compare classical and proposed quantum estimation on an identical diffuse-optical noise model and photon budget.
Rank 9/10; fit 6/10: topic overlap 1/4, complementarity 3/3, first-test feasibility 2/3. Added capability match outside the original initiative graph; prior collaboration or novelty was not established. Equal scores retain originals first, then stable profile order. The underlying capabilities and proposed first test explain the component judgments. Specific scientific limitation: A quantum advantage is especially uncertain in scattering tissue; this is an explicit falsification test.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 10
Proposal hypothesis: Somekh-Baruch's coding limits could help distinguish communication reliability from Eliahu Cohen's quantum-measurement information claims.[87][113][114]
Proposed first test: For a small measurement-induced classical channel, compare two decoders and the relevant classical reliability bound.
Rank 10/10; fit 6/10: topic overlap 1/4, complementarity 3/3, first-test feasibility 2/3. Added capability match outside the original initiative graph; prior collaboration or novelty was not established. Equal scores retain originals first, then stable profile order. The underlying capabilities and proposed first test explain the component judgments. Specific scientific limitation: Somekh-Baruch's cited expertise is classical coding; quantum-channel expertise is not inferred.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
10 candidates
Connection 1
ICFO - The Institute of Photonic Sciences
Original proposal
Mitchell's official profile documents atomic quantum optics and ultra-low-field magnetic-resonance sensing, providing the experimental capability needed to test the hypothesis; no collaboration is implied.[113][114][115][476]
Apply the proposed correction to a simulated atomic-sensor sequence and predefine the conditions under which it reduces calibration error before any benchtop study.
Rank 1/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 8 = max(1, 3+3+2): topic overlap 3/4, complementarity 3/3, feasible first test 2/3. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution. Original remains first under these components; original status breaks equal-score ties only, without a prestige bonus.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified.
Connection 2
Weizmann Institute of Science
Proposed capability match: Eliahu Cohen's quantum measurement theory, nonlocality can be paired with Zvika Brakerski's documented fully homomorphic encryption, quantum cryptography for quantum-clock correction for ultra-low-field sensing. The specific contribution is quantum-error accounting and limitations; this transfer is an analyst hypothesis.[113][114][441]
Compare toy quantum-error accounting with and without syndrome-informed correction under explicit assumptions using a toy atomic-sensor or quantum-measurement model with explicit clock-reference error. Compare observable bias and correction overhead; no atomic-clock benefit assumed with the same sequence without clock correction under the same noise assumptions.
Rank 2/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 8 = max(1, 3+2+3): topic overlap 3/4, complementarity 2/3, feasible first test 3/3. A bounded offline comparison is specified; required datasets and domain assumptions must still be checked.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified. Contribution is restricted to the scope stated in the first test.
Connection 3
Duke University
Proposed capability match: Eliahu Cohen's quantum measurement theory, nonlocality can be paired with Robert Calderbank's documented space-time coding, quantum error correction for quantum-clock correction for ultra-low-field sensing. The specific contribution is structured error models for quantum measurements; this transfer is an analyst hypothesis.[113][114][444]
Compare structured and unstructured error descriptions for repeated toy quantum measurements using a toy atomic-sensor or quantum-measurement model with explicit clock-reference error. Compare logical/measurement error and redundancy cost with the same sequence without clock correction under the same noise assumptions.
Rank 3/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 8 = max(1, 3+2+3): topic overlap 3/4, complementarity 2/3, feasible first test 3/3. A bounded offline comparison is specified; required datasets and domain assumptions must still be checked.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified. Contribution is restricted to the scope stated in the first test.
Connection 4
University of Cambridge
Proposed capability match: Eliahu Cohen's quantum measurement theory, nonlocality can be paired with Mete Atatüre's documented spin-photon interfaces, quantum sensors for quantum-clock correction for ultra-low-field sensing. The specific contribution is spin-photon interface characterization; this transfer is an analyst hypothesis.[27][113][114][432]
Model a spin/photon readout sequence with calibrated dephasing and collection-loss sweeps using a toy atomic-sensor or quantum-measurement model with explicit clock-reference error. Compare readout contrast and sensitivity to decoherence with the same sequence without clock correction under the same noise assumptions.
Rank 4/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 7 = max(1, 3+2+2): topic overlap 3/4, complementarity 2/3, feasible first test 2/3. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified.
Connection 5
The University of Chicago and Argonne National Laboratory
Proposed capability match: Eliahu Cohen's quantum measurement and quantum-time models could be tested against microscopic material models supplied by Giulia Galli's documented electronic-structure capability. This is an alternative solid-state theory experiment, not an assertion that material noise improves the original atomic-clock proposal.[113][114][453]
Construct a small material-derived Hamiltonian and compare ordinary unitary evolution with the explicitly specified quantum-time or non-Hermitian measurement model. Report observable bias, normalization failures and dependence on the electronic-structure approximation before claiming a sensing application.
Rank 5/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 7 = max(1, 2+2+3): topic overlap 2/4, complementarity 2/3, feasible first test 3/3. The material Hamiltonian is complementary to foundational measurement theory, but topic overlap is indirect. A small numerical comparison is feasible only after the formalism and observables are fixed.
Proposed alternative research direction; no relationship asserted. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. A compatible toy Hamiltonian and a falsifiable translation of the quantum-time formalism are required. No atomic-sensor benefit or partner availability is established.
Connection 6
The University of Texas at Austin
Proposed capability match: Eliahu Cohen's quantum measurement and quantum-time models could be tested against microscopic material models supplied by Feliciano Giustino's documented electronic-structure capability. This is an alternative solid-state theory experiment, not an assertion that material noise improves the original atomic-clock proposal.[113][114][134][454]
Construct a small material-derived Hamiltonian and compare ordinary unitary evolution with the explicitly specified quantum-time or non-Hermitian measurement model. Report observable bias, normalization failures and dependence on the electronic-structure approximation before claiming a sensing application.
Rank 6/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 7 = max(1, 2+2+3): topic overlap 2/4, complementarity 2/3, feasible first test 3/3. The material Hamiltonian is complementary to foundational measurement theory, but topic overlap is indirect. A small numerical comparison is feasible only after the formalism and observables are fixed.
Proposed alternative research direction; no relationship asserted. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. A compatible toy Hamiltonian and a falsifiable translation of the quantum-time formalism are required. No atomic-sensor benefit or partner availability is established.
Connection 7
Stanford University
Proposed capability match: Eliahu Cohen's quantum measurement theory, nonlocality can be paired with Jelena Vuckovic's documented integrated quantum photonics, cavity QED for quantum-clock correction for ultra-low-field sensing. The specific contribution is cavity coupling and inverse photonic design; this transfer is an analyst hypothesis.[52][113][114][500]
Compare one inverse-designed and one conventional cavity/coupler under matched fabrication constraints using a toy atomic-sensor or quantum-measurement model with explicit clock-reference error. Compare coupling efficiency, bandwidth and tolerance sensitivity with the same sequence without clock correction under the same noise assumptions.
Rank 7/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 7 = max(1, 3+2+2): topic overlap 3/4, complementarity 2/3, feasible first test 2/3. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified.
Connection 8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Proposed capability match: Eliahu Cohen's quantum measurement theory, nonlocality can be paired with Gregory Wornell's documented signal processing, statistical inference for quantum-clock correction for ultra-low-field sensing. The specific contribution is classical statistical calibration comparator; this transfer is an analyst hypothesis.[110][113][114][503]
Derive a classical estimator with the same observed data as the proposed quantum protocol using a toy atomic-sensor or quantum-measurement model with explicit clock-reference error. Compare bias and variance after nuisance clock parameters are estimated with the same sequence without clock correction under the same noise assumptions.
Rank 8/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 7 = max(1, 2+2+3): topic overlap 2/4, complementarity 2/3, feasible first test 3/3. A bounded offline comparison is specified; required datasets and domain assumptions must still be checked.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified. Contribution is restricted to the scope stated in the first test.
Connection 9
Columbia University
Proposed capability match for Eliahu Cohen with Michal Lipson: Integrated routing is a conditional implementation branch for a defined clock-phase measurement; device fidelity alone does not establish a quantum-clock advantage.[40][113][114][469]
Write a toy phase-clock readout whose observation is photon-count imbalance after an interferometer. Map circuit insertion loss and phase drift to detector efficiency and phase-noise parameters in that same observation model. Compare conventional and integrated routing under identical clock dynamics by phase-estimation error and missing detections; stop if no defensible device-to-observable mapping is available.
Rank 9/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 4 = max(1, 1+2+1): topic overlap 1/4, complementarity 2/3, feasible first test 1/3. Integrated routing is a conditional implementation branch for a defined clock-phase measurement; device fidelity alone does not establish a quantum-clock advantage. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified. Post-review scope: Integrated routing is a conditional implementation branch for a defined clock-phase measurement; device fidelity alone does not establish a quantum-clock advantage. This revised proposal awaits independent targeted re-review; simulated outcomes would establish model behavior only, not biological, clinical or deployed benefit.
Connection 10
Harvard University
Proposed capability match for Eliahu Cohen with Marko Loncar: Nonlinear photonics could supply an interface only if its noise and phase transfer can be connected to the clock observable; this platform bridge remains unconfirmed.[113][114][137][470]
Specify a hypothetical frequency-conversion interface before a toy clock-phase detector, mapping conversion efficiency, added noise and phase drift into the detector's count likelihood. Compare converted and direct optical paths at equal input photons within the same clock/estimator model. Report phase bias and variance; reject the branch if phase preservation cannot be justified.
Rank 10/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 4 = max(1, 1+2+1): topic overlap 1/4, complementarity 2/3, feasible first test 1/3. Nonlinear photonics could supply an interface only if its noise and phase transfer can be connected to the clock observable; this platform bridge remains unconfirmed. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified. Post-review scope: Nonlinear photonics could supply an interface only if its noise and phase transfer can be connected to the clock observable; this platform bridge remains unconfirmed. This revised proposal awaits independent targeted re-review; simulated outcomes would establish model behavior only, not biological, clinical or deployed benefit.
Eliahu Cohen works on quantum measurement, nonlocality and quantum time, including a 2023 quantum-clock study. [113][114]
High confidenceReview: reviewedThe roster uses the familiar Hebrew form Eli rather than the official Eliahu form.
Quantum-clock correction for ultra-low-field sensing is a future research hypothesis based on Cohen's theory and Mitchell's experimental quantum-sensing scope. [114][115]
Low confidenceReview: reviewedNo evidence yet shows that the formalism improves a physical sensor.
