optics, nanophotonics, biomedical imaging and fiber sensing
זאב זלבסקי
Identity: verifiedThe Bar-Ilan profile and university-hosted CV identify Zeev Zalevsky and match the Hebrew roster name. [116][117]
Documented foundation
Bar-Ilan professor and university vice president whose profile spans super-resolution, biomedical optics, nanophotonics and fiber-based sensing.[116][117]
super-resolution imagingbiomedical opticsnanophotonicsoptical fiber sensing
A detailed 100-page academic CV dated 2023 was inspected.[117]
Open CVRepresentative records, not a complete publication list. Metadata confirms attribution; it does not independently replicate a result.
2025 · paper
The dedicated institutional record attributes this peer-reviewed biomedical-optics study to Zalevsky and coauthors and describes a ten-subject feasibility assessment; it does not establish broader clinical performance.[138]
83 catalogued patent records · 16 identified families · family unassigned for 67 records
Coverage: Partial inventor search
Bounded inventor search across affiliations: 83 additional catalogued rows, comprising 16 inspected patent publications and 67 author-reported CV entries whose patent publications were not individually inspected. US9636041B2 and US10398314B2 are explicitly linked parent and continuation publications with different Google family IDs; separate publication rows do not establish separate inventions. Coverage remains partial across name variants, jurisdictions and publication dates, and does not include unpublished applications.
US12547018B2 · Published 2026-02-10
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Brien Holden Vision Institute Ltd
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 60, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US10656437, US11366337. The linked representative patent was also inspected; its original-assignee and publication-date fields are recorded. Record family information supports the grouped variants. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[305][401]
US12536611B2 · Published 2026-01-27
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Bar Ilan University
The inspected patent lists Zeev Zalevsky as inventor; exact name, optics topic and co-inventor/assignee context align with his first-party CV. Original assignee is recorded, not a conclusion about current legal ownership.[304]
US12519918B2 · Published 2026-01-06
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Bar Ilan University
The inspected patent lists Zeev Zalevsky as inventor; exact name, optics topic and co-inventor/assignee context align with his first-party CV. Original assignee is recorded, not a conclusion about current legal ownership.[303]
US12313916B2 · Published 2025-05-27
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Brien Holden Vision Institute Ltd
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 25, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US8169716, US10031334, US11079517. The linked representative patent was also inspected; its original-assignee and publication-date fields are recorded. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[301][366]
US12171692B2 · Published 2024-12-24
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Bar Ilan University
The inspected patent lists Zeev Zalevsky as inventor; exact name, optics topic and co-inventor/assignee context align with his first-party CV. Original assignee is recorded, not a conclusion about current legal ownership.[300]
US11838104B2 · Published 2023-12-05
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Cognifiber Ltd
The inspected patent lists Zeev Zalevsky as inventor; exact name, optics topic and co-inventor/assignee context align with his first-party CV. Original assignee is recorded, not a conclusion about current legal ownership.[299]
US11737677B2 · Published 2023-08-29
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: ContinUse Biometrics Ltd
The inspected publication explicitly names Zeev Zalevsky and Nisim Nisan Ozana on the established optical-sensing subject. No CV entry is asserted for this exact publication; the inspected patent front matter supplies the inventor attribution. Assignee is observed original-assignee metadata, not a current-ownership conclusion.[177]
US11406294B2 · Published 2022-08-09
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: ContinUse Biometrics Ltd
The inspected publication explicitly names Zeev Zalevsky and Nisim Nisan Ozana on the established optical-sensing subject. The unchanged March 2023 CV snapshot, patent entry 74, lists US11406294 and Z. Zalevsky. Its historical author-report claim remains in packet 2; the linked publication is now separately inspected. Assignee is observed original-assignee metadata, not a current-ownership conclusion.[174][415]
US20210063563A1 · Published 2021-03-04
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Bar Ilan University
The inspected publication explicitly names Zeev Zalevsky and Nisim Nisan Ozana on the established optical-sensing subject. No CV entry is asserted for this exact publication; the inspected patent front matter supplies the inventor attribution. Assignee is observed original-assignee metadata, not a current-ownership conclusion.[43]
US10856739B2 · Published 2020-12-08
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: ContinUse Biometrics Ltd
The inspected publication explicitly names Zeev Zalevsky and Nisim Nisan Ozana on the established optical-sensing subject. The unchanged March 2023 CV snapshot, patent entry 63, lists US10856739 and Z. Zalevsky. Its historical author-report claim remains in packet 2; the linked publication is now separately inspected. Assignee is observed original-assignee metadata, not a current-ownership conclusion.[168][404]
US10724846B2 · Published 2020-07-28
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: ContinUse Biometrics Ltd
The inspected publication explicitly names Zeev Zalevsky and Nisim Nisan Ozana on the established optical-sensing subject. The unchanged March 2023 CV snapshot, patent entry 61, lists US10724846 and Z. Zalevsky. Its historical author-report claim remains in packet 2; the linked publication is now separately inspected. Assignee is observed original-assignee metadata, not a current-ownership conclusion.[165][402]
US10608002B2 · Published 2020-03-31
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Apple Inc
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 27, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US8400494, US9066084, US9437006, US9704249, US10340280, US10608002. The linked representative patent was also inspected; its original-assignee and publication-date fields are recorded. Record family information supports the grouped variants. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[296][368]
US10595755B2 · Published 2020-03-24
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: ContinUse Biometrics Ltd
The inspected publication explicitly names Zeev Zalevsky and Nisim Nisan Ozana on the established optical-sensing subject. The unchanged March 2023 CV snapshot, patent entry 59, lists US10595755 and Z. Zalevsky. Its historical author-report claim remains in packet 2; the linked publication is now separately inspected. Assignee is observed original-assignee metadata, not a current-ownership conclusion.[164][400]
US10398314B2 · Published 2019-09-03
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Universitat de Valencia; Bar Ilan University
The inspected publication explicitly names Zeev Zalevsky and Nisim Nisan Ozana on the established optical-sensing subject. The unchanged March 2023 CV snapshot, patent entry 45, lists US9636041 and US10398314 and Z. Zalevsky. Its historical author-report claim remains in packet 2; the linked publication is now separately inspected. Related Parent Applications explicitly names US9636041B2 as continuation parent. Google Family IDs differ (50027363 versus 83852931); this is a separate publication row, not a claim of a separate invention. Assignee is observed original-assignee metadata, not a current-ownership conclusion.[162][386]
US9636041B2 · Published 2017-05-02
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Universitat de Valencia; Bar Ilan University
The inspected publication explicitly names Zeev Zalevsky and Nisim Nisan Ozana on the established optical-sensing subject. The unchanged March 2023 CV snapshot, patent entry 45, lists US9636041 and US10398314 and Z. Zalevsky. Its historical author-report claim remains in packet 2; the linked publication is now separately inspected. Google Family ID 83852931 is observed. The separately listed US10398314B2 is its expressly recorded continuation, with different Google Family ID 50027363; separate publication rows do not imply separate inventions. Assignee is observed original-assignee metadata, not a current-ownership conclusion.[206][386]
US6166833A · Published 2000-12-26
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 1, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US6166833. The linked representative patent was also inspected; its original-assignee and publication-date fields are recorded. Record family information supports the grouped variants. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[331][342]
US9958601
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 50, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US9958601. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[391]
US9954620
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 49, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US9954620. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[390]
US9916433
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 48, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US9916433. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[389]
US9668672
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 47, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US9668672, US10390729, US11129544. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[388]
US9661986
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 46, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US9661986. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[387]
US9513225
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 44, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US9513225. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[385]
US9477043
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 43, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US9477043. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[384]
US9344700
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 41, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US9344700. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[382]
US9288045
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 40, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US9288045. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[381]
US9239471
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 39, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US9239471, US10078159. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[380]
US9199081
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 38, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US9199081. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[379]
US9134543
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 37, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US9134543, US10175392, US11199651. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[378]
US9063283
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 36, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US9063283. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[377]
US8955968
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 35, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US8955968, US9500875. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[376]
US8913331
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 34, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US8913331, US9429768. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[375]
US8908016
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 33, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US8908016, US9501833. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[374]
US8860948
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 32, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US8860948. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[373]
US8792159
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 31, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US8792159. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[372]
US8638991
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 30, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US8638991. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[371]
US8570655
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 29, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US8570655. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[370]
US8531783
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 28, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US8531783. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[369]
US8390821
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 26, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US8390821. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[367]
US8169695
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 22, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US8169695. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[363]
US8155484
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 24, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US8155484. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[365]
US8098949
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 23, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US8098949. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[364]
US8050461
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 21, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US8050461, US8374397. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[362]
US8009358
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 20, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US8009358. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[361]
US7936522
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 19, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US7936522. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[360]
US7812295
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 18, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US7812295. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[359]
US7800683
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 17, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US7800683. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[358]
US7777932
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 15, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US7777932. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[356]
US7777929
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 16, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US7777929. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[357]
US7746559
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 14, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US7746559. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[355]
US7646549
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 13, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US7646549, US8040604. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[354]
US7433024
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 12, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US7433024. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[353]
US7194139
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 9, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US7194139. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[350]
US7158317
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 10, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US7158317. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[351]
US7128420
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 11, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US7128420. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[352]
US7061693
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 8, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US7061693, US7365917, US7859769, US8192022. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[349]
US7012749
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 7, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US7012749. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[348]
US7003177
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 6, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US7003177. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[347]
US6807329
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 5, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US6807329. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[346]
US6344893
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 3, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US6344893. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[344]
US6343307
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 4, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US6343307. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[345]
US5909312
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 92, Issued Patents item 2, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US5909312. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[343]
US11506604
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 75, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US11506604. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[416]
US11284786
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 73, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US11284786. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[414]
US11202040
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 72, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US11202040. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[413]
US11169176
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 71, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US11169176. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[412]
US11085753
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 70, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US11085753. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[411]
US11061185
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 69, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US11061185. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[410]
US10989517
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 68, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US10989517. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[409]
US10931881
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 67, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US10931881. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[408]
US10914633
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 66, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US10914633. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[407]
US10883818
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 65, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US10883818. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[406]
US10861171
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 64, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US10861171. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[405]
US10750956
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 62, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US10750956. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[403]
US10585272
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 58, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US10585272. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[399]
US10429580
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 57, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US10429580, US10838139. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[398]
US10420842
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 56, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US10420842. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[397]
US10398294
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 54, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US10398294. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[395]
US10394051
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 55, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US10394051. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[396]
US10186825
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 53, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US10186825. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[394]
US10033996
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 51, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: US10033996. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[392]
JP5989666
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 42, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: JP5989666. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[383]
IL224958
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 93, Issued Patents item 52, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: IL224958. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[393]
EP3790450B1
Author-reported · publication not independently inspected
First-party CV page 94, Issued Patents item 76, explicitly credits Z. Zalevsky. CV-listed US/representative identifiers: EP3790450B1. CV-only attribution; publication kind code, publication date and applicant not verified, so no values are invented. The record URL points to the inspected CV page. The CV item is an editorial grouping, not an audited worldwide patent family. Additional jurisdiction forms appear in the source snapshot; ambiguous application/internal references are not independently counted.[417]
Original evidence: reported only
The official profile reports approximately 100 patents, but this bounded pass did not inspect a specific record, family scope or ownership.[116]
Records are counted separately from identified families. Author-reported entries are labelled and may still need publication verification. Inventorship, publication-time applicant and current ownership are different facts. No legal-status, patentability or freedom-to-operate conclusion is made.
Scores prioritize research fit from 1–10; they are not probabilities.
Review: Reviewed with limitations
Proposed capability matches, not confirmed relationships. Scores are analyst judgments with low forecast confidence; researcher interests, capacity and feasibility need confirmation.
13 candidates
Connection 1
Original proposal
Proposal hypothesis: Lewi's metasurface design and Zalevsky's super-resolution and nanophotonics meet on compact imaging with controlled angular response.[67][68][116][117][138]
Proposed first test: Compare a simulated metasurface imaging element with a conventional aperture over fixed angles; measure reconstruction error and tolerance to aberration.
Rank 1/13; fit 9/10 (4 topic overlap + 2 complementarity + 3 feasible first test). Preserved original co-membership proposal in o06. No strictly higher-scoring candidate displaces this original. Substantial optics overlap reduces complementarity; any diagnostic gain requires a separate application test. No automatic score boost for original membership. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work. Original initiative conditions remain: o06 Tomer Lewi: Conditional later role: add a photonic component only if the baseline study identifies an optical bottleneck that it can address. o06 Zeev Zalevsky: Conditional later role: assess an imaging/readout change only if it targets the dominant measured bottleneck.
Connection 2
Proposal hypothesis: Ozana's diffuse brain monitoring and Zalevsky's biomedical and fiber sensing offer complementary routes to identify motion-sensitive optical artifacts.[41][42][116][117][138]
Proposed first test: Compare two optical readout models on a tissue phantom with controlled motion; measure perfusion-estimate bias and repeatability.
Rank 2/13; fit 9/10 (4 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. Phantom performance does not establish human monitoring or clinical utility. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 3
Proposal hypothesis: Alon's expansion sequencing and Zalevsky's super-resolution methods can test optical resolution against spatial molecular registration accuracy.[60][61][116][117][138]
Proposed first test: Use an open image stack or known-point phantom to compare localization error before and after a reconstruction step.
Rank 3/13; fit 9/10 (4 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. Apparent resolution gains may create false spots; sequencing identity and registration controls are required. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 4
Original proposal
Proposal hypothesis: Danielli's optical background suppression and Zalevsky's biomedical optics could separate sample preparation gains from readout gains.[45][46][47][116][117][138]
Proposed first test: Measure a fixed phantom/dilution panel with a standard readout and a proposed optical reconstruction; report detection repeatability and background sensitivity.
Rank 4/13; fit 8/10 (3 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). Preserved original co-membership proposal in o06. An added candidate, Nisan Ozana (9/10), ranks above this original because its stated pair-specific roles and first test score higher; this original is limited as follows: A new readout must target the dominant measured error; broader imaging expertise alone is not evidence of assay improvement. No automatic score boost for original membership. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work. Original initiative conditions remain: o06 Zeev Zalevsky: Conditional later role: assess an imaging/readout change only if it targets the dominant measured bottleneck.
Connection 5
Original proposal
Proposal hypothesis: Popovtzer can define nanoprobe contrast and nonspecific uptake controls while Zalevsky assesses an optical imaging readout.[53][54][116][117][138]
Proposed first test: Use a tissue-mimicking phantom with known probe concentrations to compare contrast recovery and depth sensitivity against a conventional image.
Rank 5/13; fit 8/10 (3 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). Preserved original co-membership proposal in o06. An added candidate, Nisan Ozana (9/10), ranks above this original because its stated pair-specific roles and first test score higher; this original is limited as follows: An optical phantom cannot establish in-vivo targeting, safety or therapeutic efficacy. No automatic score boost for original membership. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work. Original initiative conditions remain: o06 Zeev Zalevsky: Conditional later role: assess an imaging/readout change only if it targets the dominant measured bottleneck.
Connection 6
Proposal hypothesis: Shefi's three-dimensional neural cultures provide controlled structures for Zalevsky's super-resolution and biomedical imaging.[8][116][117][138]
Proposed first test: Generate a known-geometry 3D phantom or use existing labelled culture images to compare reconstruction error with conventional microscopy.
Rank 6/13; fit 8/10 (3 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. Resolution improvement must preserve viability and avoid unsupported functional interpretation. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 7
Proposal hypothesis: Tesler's antifouling interfaces could preserve the calibration of Zalevsky's fiber or biomedical optical sensing surfaces.[12][13][116][117][138]
Proposed first test: Use a sensor-window phantom with controlled deposits and compare signal drift for coated and uncoated windows.
Rank 7/13; fit 8/10 (3 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. Optical transparency and coating longevity must be checked independently. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 8
Proposal hypothesis: Panfil's nanocrystal emitters provide point-source and background controls for Zalevsky's super-resolution optics.[25][26][116][117][138]
Proposed first test: Use a synthetic emitter-spacing series with a fixed photon budget and compare recovered separation and false splitting against conventional imaging.
Rank 8/13; fit 8/10 (3 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. No biological labelling performance or emitter stability in tissue is claimed. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 9
Proposal hypothesis: Fridman's temporal microscopy and Zalevsky's super-resolution imaging could test complementary limits on time and spatial resolution.[34][116][117][138]
Proposed first test: Propagate a synthetic fast-moving target through separate and combined resolution models; report recovered spatial and temporal bandwidth.
Rank 9/13; fit 8/10 (3 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. A common optical architecture and photon budget are unverified. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 10
Proposal hypothesis: Zalevsky can define a fiber or biomedical optical measurement while Desiatov tests an integrated nonlinear readout component.[116][117][135][136][138]
Proposed first test: Model one phantom-derived spectrum through an on-chip converter and compare reconstruction error and optical loss with conventional detection.
Rank 10/13; fit 8/10 (3 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. The converter must address a measured readout bottleneck, not merely miniaturize it. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 11
Proposal hypothesis: Erez can define a neural or behavioural reference signal and Zalevsky can test whether a non-contact optical proxy tracks it reliably.[28][29][116][117][138]
Proposed first test: Specify a synthetic or existing approved paired dataset and compare lag-aware association with motion-only and shuffled controls.
Rank 11/13; fit 7/10 (2 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. An optical proxy is not neural activity; human work needs its own protocol and consent. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 12
Proposal hypothesis: Blau's quantum frequency control and Zalevsky's imaging methods could examine whether spectral multiplexing improves a bounded reconstruction task.[37][38][116][117][138]
Proposed first test: Simulate two frequency-labelled image channels at equal photons and compare reconstruction error with ordinary spectral separation.
Rank 12/13; fit 7/10 (2 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. Frequency multiplexing does not imply improved spatial resolution or a quantum advantage. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 13
Proposal hypothesis: Zektzer's hybrid sensing interface could use Zalevsky's fiber-sensing and optical-readout expertise for a compact coupling comparison.[50][51][116][117][138]
Proposed first test: Compare a free-space and fiber-coupled resonator model on collection loss and alignment drift.
Rank 13/13; fit 7/10 (2 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. Packaging and atomic operating conditions must be defined before the general optics contribution is useful. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
10 candidates
Connection 1
University of California, Los Angeles
Original proposal
Ozcan's official profile documents computational imaging, microscopy, biosensing and mobile-health systems that complement Zalevsky's optical hardware and scattering expertise; this is a proposed match.[116][117][118][482]
Use calibrated tissue phantoms and a preregistered held-out set to compare reconstruction error and uncertainty with conventional low-cost imaging.
Rank 1/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 9 = max(1, 4+3+2): topic overlap 4/4, complementarity 3/3, feasible first test 2/3. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution. Original remains first under these components; original status breaks equal-score ties only, without a prestige bonus.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified.
Connection 2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Proposed capability match: Zeev Zalevsky's super-resolution imaging, biomedical optics can be paired with Gregory Wornell's documented signal processing, statistical inference for passive optical digital twin for low-resource screening. The specific contribution is joint statistical inference and information constraints; this transfer is an analyst hypothesis.[110][116][117][503]
Compare full-data inference with task-specific compressed statistics at fixed communication or storage budget using calibrated optical phantom images held out by scattering and acquisition condition. Compare estimation error, calibration and bits per valid decision with a conventional low-cost reconstruction with matched input information.
Rank 2/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 9 = max(1, 3+3+3): topic overlap 3/4, complementarity 3/3, feasible first test 3/3. A bounded offline comparison is specified; required datasets and domain assumptions must still be checked.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified.
Connection 3
Boston University
Proposed capability match: Zeev Zalevsky's super-resolution imaging, biomedical optics can be paired with David Boas's documented neurophotonics, functional near-infrared spectroscopy for passive optical digital twin for low-resource screening. The specific contribution is neurovascular optical measurement; this transfer is an analyst hypothesis.[44][116][117][438]
Fit a physiological optical forward model with controlled flow and absorption perturbations using calibrated optical phantom images held out by scattering and acquisition condition. Compare flow-estimation bias and sensitivity to extracerebral contamination with a conventional low-cost reconstruction with matched input information.
Rank 3/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 8 = max(1, 3+3+2): topic overlap 3/4, complementarity 3/3, feasible first test 2/3. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified.
Connection 4
University of Oxford
Proposed capability match: Zeev Zalevsky's super-resolution imaging, biomedical optics can be paired with Yarin Gal's documented Bayesian deep learning, uncertainty estimation for passive optical digital twin for low-resource screening. The specific contribution is uncertainty and selective prediction; this transfer is an analyst hypothesis.[78][116][117][452]
Compare uncertainty estimates with calibrated single-model and ensemble baselines under a predefined shift using calibrated optical phantom images held out by scattering and acquisition condition. Compare calibration error, risk-coverage and confident-error rate with a conventional low-cost reconstruction with matched input information.
Rank 4/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 8 = max(1, 2+3+3): topic overlap 2/4, complementarity 3/3, feasible first test 3/3. A bounded offline comparison is specified; required datasets and domain assumptions must still be checked.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified.
Connection 5
Columbia University
Proposed capability match: Zeev Zalevsky's super-resolution imaging, biomedical optics can be paired with Michal Lipson's documented integrated nanophotonics, on-chip modulation for passive optical digital twin for low-resource screening. The specific contribution is integrated optical modulation and light confinement; this transfer is an analyst hypothesis.[40][116][117][469]
Simulate a small integrated modulation/interference circuit with realistic propagation loss using calibrated optical phantom images held out by scattering and acquisition condition. Compare conversion or routing fidelity, insertion loss and fabrication sensitivity with a conventional low-cost reconstruction with matched input information.
Rank 5/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 8 = max(1, 3+3+2): topic overlap 3/4, complementarity 3/3, feasible first test 2/3. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified.
Connection 6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Proposed capability match for Zeev Zalevsky with Ed Boyden: Cellular imaging can complement computational microscopy when cellular labels and ground truth are specified rather than assumed in generic optical phantoms.[116][117][440]
Generate labelled-cell image pairs with known cell positions, channel overlap and scattering. Compare registration/unmixing methods on identical rendered measurements by cell-localization error and false matches, with known synthetic labels as reference. This is a separate cellular-imaging branch; no optical manipulation of archived phantom images is possible.
Rank 6/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 7 = max(1, 2+3+2): topic overlap 2/4, complementarity 3/3, feasible first test 2/3. Cellular imaging can complement computational microscopy when cellular labels and ground truth are specified rather than assumed in generic optical phantoms. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified. Post-review scope: Cellular imaging can complement computational microscopy when cellular labels and ground truth are specified rather than assumed in generic optical phantoms. This revised proposal awaits independent targeted re-review; simulated outcomes would establish model behavior only, not biological, clinical or deployed benefit.
Connection 7
University of California, Berkeley
Proposed capability match: Zeev Zalevsky's super-resolution imaging, biomedical optics can be paired with Rikky Muller's documented integrated circuits, biosystems for passive optical digital twin for low-resource screening. The specific contribution is bioelectronic acquisition interfaces; this transfer is an analyst hypothesis.[116][117][436]
Simulate front-end noise and sampling duty cycle before selecting a sensor interface using calibrated optical phantom images held out by scattering and acquisition condition. Compare signal-to-noise ratio and acquisition power with a conventional low-cost reconstruction with matched input information.
Rank 7/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 7 = max(1, 2+3+2): topic overlap 2/4, complementarity 3/3, feasible first test 2/3. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified.
Connection 8
University of California, Berkeley
Proposed capability match for Zeev Zalevsky with Jun-Chau Chien: A biosensor acquisition interface could support optical measurement, but archived images alone provide neither fluidic samples nor a calibration experiment.[116][117][436]
Define a prospective microfluidic optical detector with stipulated particle trajectories and detector waveforms. Compare two digital acquisition/calibration schemes on identical simulated trajectories and blank-channel noise by concentration-estimation bias and event-detection error. Hold fluidic behavior fixed; physical mixing and contamination need new sample experiments.
Rank 8/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 6 = max(1, 2+2+2): topic overlap 2/4, complementarity 2/3, feasible first test 2/3. A biosensor acquisition interface could support optical measurement, but archived images alone provide neither fluidic samples nor a calibration experiment. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified. Post-review scope: A biosensor acquisition interface could support optical measurement, but archived images alone provide neither fluidic samples nor a calibration experiment. This revised proposal awaits independent targeted re-review; simulated outcomes would establish model behavior only, not biological, clinical or deployed benefit.
Connection 9
Stanford University
Proposed capability match for Zeev Zalevsky with Stephen Quake: Cell-isolation expertise could motivate a measurement-bias study in a separate cellular branch, not a physical experiment on existing optical images.[116][117][487]
Generate synthetic cell images and counts from a known population, then computationally apply capture-selection bias, cell overlap and background contamination. Hold image reconstruction fixed; compare inferred population counts under ideal versus biased capture against model truth. A real isolation/dilution protocol would require fresh samples and an explicitly selected cellular application.
Rank 9/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 5 = max(1, 1+2+2): topic overlap 1/4, complementarity 2/3, feasible first test 2/3. Cell-isolation expertise could motivate a measurement-bias study in a separate cellular branch, not a physical experiment on existing optical images. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified. Post-review scope: Cell-isolation expertise could motivate a measurement-bias study in a separate cellular branch, not a physical experiment on existing optical images. This revised proposal awaits independent targeted re-review; simulated outcomes would establish model behavior only, not biological, clinical or deployed benefit.
Connection 10
Carnegie Mellon University
Proposed capability match for Zeev Zalevsky with Bin He: Electrophysiological methods are a conditional multimodal branch requiring a shared latent observable and acquisition model; the existing optical phantom does not supply that modality.[30][116][117][461]
Specify a hypothetical joint optical/electrical sensing model with one known latent signal, separate forward operators and synchronized sampling. Compare optical-only and joint inverse estimation on the same synthetic trials by latent-signal error under modality dropout. First justify why electrophysiology belongs to the imaging application; no electrical signal is inferred from optical phantom pixels.
Rank 10/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 4 = max(1, 1+2+1): topic overlap 1/4, complementarity 2/3, feasible first test 1/3. Electrophysiological methods are a conditional multimodal branch requiring a shared latent observable and acquisition model; the existing optical phantom does not supply that modality. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified. Post-review scope: Electrophysiological methods are a conditional multimodal branch requiring a shared latent observable and acquisition model; the existing optical phantom does not supply that modality. This revised proposal awaits independent targeted re-review; simulated outcomes would establish model behavior only, not biological, clinical or deployed benefit.
Zeev Zalevsky's official record spans super-resolution, biomedical optics, nanophotonics and optical-fiber sensing and reports a large patent portfolio. [116][117]
Moderate confidenceReview: reviewedNo individual patent record was inspected, and the 2023 CV may omit later outputs.
A passive optical digital twin for low-resource screening is a future research hypothesis joining Zalevsky's physical optics with Ozcan's computational microscopy. [116][118]
Low confidenceReview: reviewedNo diagnostic accuracy, affordability or clinical utility has been demonstrated.
