2026 · paper
Engineering Angular Dispersion via Hybrid Local–Nonlocal Metasurfaces
Studies hybrid local–nonlocal metasurfaces as a route to engineer angular optical dispersion.[67]
Nanophotonics and metasurfaces
תומר לוי
Identity: verifiedThe roster maps to the source-spelled Tomer Lewi on BIU engineering and research-portal pages. [67][68]
Documented foundation
Lewi studies engineered light–matter interaction in nanophotonic and metasurface systems.[67][68]
metasurface designnanophotonicsnano-spectroscopyelectro-optics
The BIU biography and research portal were inspected; no standalone current CV was verified.[67][68]
Representative records, not a complete publication list. Metadata confirms attribution; it does not independently replicate a result.
2026 · paper
Studies hybrid local–nonlocal metasurfaces as a route to engineer angular optical dispersion.[67]
1 catalogued patent record · 1 identified family
Coverage: Partial inventor search
University patent list and individual US publication agree on application 18/766,826 and inventors Tomer Lewi/Shany Cohen. Prior UCSB-era work was not excluded by affiliation. One family added; no exhaustive claim.
US20250020950A1 · Published 2025-01-16
Published patent document inspected
Publication assignee: Bar Ilan University
Named inventor Tomer LEWI; own institutional patent list corroborates application/title/co-inventor identity. Assignee is the captured publication metadata, not a current-ownership determination.[239][252]
Original evidence: not verified
No attributable patent record was verified in the bounded search.
Records are counted separately from identified families. Author-reported entries are labelled and may still need publication verification. Inventorship, publication-time applicant and current ownership are different facts. No legal-status, patentability or freedom-to-operate conclusion is made.
Scores prioritize research fit from 1–10; they are not probabilities.
Review: Reviewed with limitations
Proposed capability matches, not confirmed relationships. Scores are analyst judgments with low forecast confidence; researcher interests, capacity and feasibility need confirmation.
11 candidates
Connection 1
Original proposal
Proposal hypothesis: Lewi's metasurface design and Zalevsky's super-resolution and nanophotonics meet on compact imaging with controlled angular response.[67][68][116][117][138]
Proposed first test: Compare a simulated metasurface imaging element with a conventional aperture over fixed angles; measure reconstruction error and tolerance to aberration.
Rank 1/11; fit 9/10 (4 topic overlap + 2 complementarity + 3 feasible first test). Preserved original co-membership proposal in o06. No strictly higher-scoring candidate displaces this original. Substantial optics overlap reduces complementarity; any diagnostic gain requires a separate application test. No automatic score boost for original membership. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work. Original initiative conditions remain: o06 Tomer Lewi: Conditional later role: add a photonic component only if the baseline study identifies an optical bottleneck that it can address. o06 Zeev Zalevsky: Conditional later role: assess an imaging/readout change only if it targets the dominant measured bottleneck.
Connection 2
Proposal hypothesis: Lewi's metasurface and nano-spectroscopy work overlaps with Desiatov's integrated nonlinear optics, with a possible passive/active component division.[67][68][135][136]
Proposed first test: Model a metasurface input stage feeding a nonlinear converter and compare coupling bandwidth and total loss to direct input.
Rank 2/11; fit 9/10 (4 topic overlap + 2 complementarity + 3 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. Closely related photonic roles limit complementarity; cascading devices may worsen loss. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 3
Original proposal
Proposal hypothesis: Danielli can identify a background-limited assay and Lewi can model a metasurface filter or collection element for that measured optical bottleneck.[45][46][47][67][68]
Proposed first test: Use the reference assay spectrum in an optical model; compare signal collection and background rejection with a conventional filter.
Rank 3/11; fit 8/10 (3 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). Preserved original co-membership proposal in o06. An added candidate, Boris Desiatov (9/10), ranks above this original because its stated pair-specific roles and first test score higher; this original is limited as follows: The original photonic addition is conditional on a demonstrated optical bottleneck and plausible fabrication tolerances. No automatic score boost for original membership. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work. Original initiative conditions remain: o06 Tomer Lewi: Conditional later role: add a photonic component only if the baseline study identifies an optical bottleneck that it can address.
Connection 4
Proposal hypothesis: Tesler can characterize fouling at interfaces while Lewi models its effect on a metasurface's optical response.[12][13][67][68]
Proposed first test: Sweep a deposited-layer thickness in a metasurface model and compare spectral drift before and after a proposed coating.
Rank 4/11; fit 8/10 (3 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. The coating's refractive index and stability need measurement. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 5
Proposal hypothesis: Panfil's quantum nanocrystal emission and Lewi's metasurface control meet on efficient directional collection.[25][26][67][68]
Proposed first test: Model a bounded emitter spectrum near a passive metasurface and compare collection efficiency, angular spread and loss with a flat interface.
Rank 5/11; fit 8/10 (3 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. Preserving emitter purity and avoiding quenching need later measurements. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 6
Proposal hypothesis: Fridman's temporal optics and Lewi's metasurfaces could separate temporal and angular dispersion in a compact optical processor.[34][67][68]
Proposed first test: Compare a time-lens model with and without an angularly dispersive surface on pulse distortion over incidence angle.
Rank 6/11; fit 8/10 (3 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. A metasurface may add loss without improving temporal control. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 7
Proposal hypothesis: Blau's quantum-mode requirements could constrain Lewi's angular/spectral metasurface transformations.[37][38][67][68]
Proposed first test: Model two frequency modes through a dispersive surface and compare coherence-preserving transfer with an incoherent classical control.
Rank 7/11; fit 8/10 (3 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. Quantum-compatible loss and polarization response need qualification. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 8
Proposal hypothesis: Zektzer's microresonator interface and Lewi's nanophotonic surface design share a problem of controlling local optical coupling.[50][51][67][68]
Proposed first test: Simulate one resonator with two coupling structures and compare coupling fraction, linewidth and angular sensitivity.
Rank 8/11; fit 8/10 (3 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. The surface design must respect atomic-vapor and fabrication constraints. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 9
Proposal hypothesis: Lewi's metasurface response can be constrained by Goldzak Mizrahi's material and light-matter calculations.[67][68][132][133]
Proposed first test: Propagate two material-response estimates into one metasurface model and compare resonance shift with a constant-index approximation.
Rank 9/11; fit 8/10 (3 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. Parameter transfer across microscopic and device models needs validation. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
Connection 10
Original proposal
Proposal hypothesis: Popovtzer's imaging nanoprobes and Lewi's light-matter design could test whether a spectral surface improves probe discrimination in complex backgrounds.[53][54][67][68]
Proposed first test: Model measured or openly reported probe spectra through a candidate metasurface response and compare separation with ordinary bandpass filtering.
Rank 10/11; fit 7/10 (2 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). Preserved original co-membership proposal in o06. An added candidate, Boris Desiatov (9/10), ranks above this original because its stated pair-specific roles and first test score higher; this original is limited as follows: Probe-surface compatibility and a relevant optical bottleneck need confirmation before fabrication or biological testing. No automatic score boost for original membership. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work. Original initiative conditions remain: o06 Tomer Lewi: Conditional later role: add a photonic component only if the baseline study identifies an optical bottleneck that it can address.
Connection 11
Proposal hypothesis: Sadia's thermoelectric and ceramic materials could supply a temperature-dependent response for Lewi's light-matter design.[31][32][67][68]
Proposed first test: Model a measured candidate material response in a passive optical element and compare temperature sensitivity with a conventional dielectric.
Rank 11/11; fit 7/10 (2 topic overlap + 3 complementarity + 2 feasible first test). New pairing outside the frozen portfolio co-member graph. The material must have suitable optical loss and processing compatibility. Equal scores use existing-first, then stable researcher ID.
Analyst proposal hypothesis, not an established collaboration, commitment, evidence-confidence rating or assessment of researcher quality; confirm participation and access before work.
10 candidates
Connection 1
California Institute of Technology
Original proposal
His metasurface, two-dimensional-material, and quantum-nanophotonics work could complement tunability and heterogeneous integration; no willingness is asserted.[67][68][69][434]
Fabricate a small passive prototype and reconstruct a fixed spectral target set under controlled angles.
Rank 1/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 9 = max(1, 4+3+2): topic overlap 4/4, complementarity 3/3, feasible first test 2/3. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution. Original remains first under these components; original status breaks equal-score ties only, without a prestige bonus.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified.
Connection 2
Stanford University
Proposed capability match: Tomer Lewi's metasurface design, nanophotonics can be paired with Jelena Vuckovic's documented integrated quantum photonics, cavity QED for adaptive multispectral optical edge sensor. The specific contribution is cavity coupling and inverse photonic design; this transfer is an analyst hypothesis.[52][67][68][500]
Compare one inverse-designed and one conventional cavity/coupler under matched fabrication constraints using a simulated multispectral metasurface sensor with fixed aperture and material constraints. Compare coupling efficiency, bandwidth and tolerance sensitivity with a static unpatterned or conventional-filter optical front end.
Rank 2/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 9 = max(1, 4+3+2): topic overlap 4/4, complementarity 3/3, feasible first test 2/3. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified.
Connection 3
Columbia University
Proposed capability match: Tomer Lewi's metasurface design, nanophotonics can be paired with Michal Lipson's documented integrated nanophotonics, on-chip modulation for adaptive multispectral optical edge sensor. The specific contribution is integrated optical modulation and light confinement; this transfer is an analyst hypothesis.[40][67][68][469]
Simulate a small integrated modulation/interference circuit with realistic propagation loss using a simulated multispectral metasurface sensor with fixed aperture and material constraints. Compare conversion or routing fidelity, insertion loss and fabrication sensitivity with a static unpatterned or conventional-filter optical front end.
Rank 3/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 8 = max(1, 3+3+2): topic overlap 3/4, complementarity 3/3, feasible first test 2/3. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified.
Connection 4
Harvard University
Proposed capability match: Tomer Lewi's metasurface design, nanophotonics can be paired with Marko Loncar's documented nanoscale optics, quantum engineering for adaptive multispectral optical edge sensor. The specific contribution is nanoscale integrated quantum optics; this transfer is an analyst hypothesis.[67][68][137][470]
Model a compact nonlinear optical element with realistic loss and fabrication variation using a simulated multispectral metasurface sensor with fixed aperture and material constraints. Compare conversion efficiency, noise and sensitivity to geometry with a static unpatterned or conventional-filter optical front end.
Rank 4/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 8 = max(1, 3+3+2): topic overlap 3/4, complementarity 3/3, feasible first test 2/3. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified.
Connection 5
University of California, Los Angeles
Proposed capability match: Tomer Lewi's metasurface design, nanophotonics can be paired with Aydogan Ozcan's documented computational imaging, microscopy for adaptive multispectral optical edge sensor. The specific contribution is computational imaging and quantitative reconstruction; this transfer is an analyst hypothesis.[67][68][118][482]
Compare conventional reconstruction with a learned inverse model on matched phantom data held out by acquisition condition using a simulated multispectral metasurface sensor with fixed aperture and material constraints. Compare reconstruction bias, resolution and uncertainty under hardware shift with a static unpatterned or conventional-filter optical front end.
Rank 5/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 8 = max(1, 3+3+2): topic overlap 3/4, complementarity 3/3, feasible first test 2/3. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified.
Connection 6
University of California, Berkeley
Proposed capability match: Tomer Lewi's metasurface design, nanophotonics can be paired with Ming Wu's documented silicon photonics, photonic integrated circuits for adaptive multispectral optical edge sensor. The specific contribution is integrated optical routing and sensing; this transfer is an analyst hypothesis.[67][68][436]
Simulate a two-channel photonic routing/readout block under fabrication tolerances using a simulated multispectral metasurface sensor with fixed aperture and material constraints. Compare insertion loss, crosstalk and readout variation with a static unpatterned or conventional-filter optical front end.
Rank 6/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 8 = max(1, 3+3+2): topic overlap 3/4, complementarity 3/3, feasible first test 2/3. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified.
Connection 7
Harvard University
Proposed capability match: Tomer Lewi's metasurface design, nanophotonics can be paired with Joanna Aizenberg's documented adaptive bioinspired surfaces, surface chemistry for adaptive multispectral optical edge sensor. The specific contribution is adaptive interfacial chemistry; this transfer is an analyst hypothesis.[15][67][68][431]
Contrast static and responsive surface designs under a controlled environmental perturbation using a simulated multispectral metasurface sensor with fixed aperture and material constraints. Compare surface response, reversibility and fouling or adhesion change with a static unpatterned or conventional-filter optical front end.
Rank 7/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 7 = max(1, 2+3+2): topic overlap 2/4, complementarity 3/3, feasible first test 2/3. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified.
Connection 8
The University of Texas at Austin
Proposed capability match for Tomer Lewi with Feliciano Giustino: Temperature-dependent material theory can address spectral drift through an explicit refractive-index link; assumed coefficients are not validated first-principles results.[67][68][134][454]
Declare a candidate material's temperature-dependent refractive-index model with uncertain coefficients, then propagate its index change through a fixed metasurface geometry. Compare resonance shift and resulting concentration-estimation bias with a temperature-independent-index control on identical simulated spectra. Establish whether microscopic temperature calculations can constrain the coefficients before asserting a predictive material model.
Rank 8/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 7 = max(1, 2+3+2): topic overlap 2/4, complementarity 3/3, feasible first test 2/3. Temperature-dependent material theory can address spectral drift through an explicit refractive-index link; assumed coefficients are not validated first-principles results. A bounded offline comparison is specified; required datasets and domain assumptions must still be checked.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified. Post-review scope: Temperature-dependent material theory can address spectral drift through an explicit refractive-index link; assumed coefficients are not validated first-principles results. This revised proposal awaits independent targeted re-review; simulated outcomes would establish model behavior only, not biological, clinical or deployed benefit.
Connection 9
The University of Chicago and Argonne National Laboratory
Proposed capability match for Tomer Lewi with Giulia Galli: Electronic structure contributes only through a material-to-optical parameter map; the material choice and reliable optical constants remain prerequisites.[67][68][453]
Choose one proposed metasurface material and identify its required complex permittivity over the sensor band. Audit whether a tractable electronic-structure calculation can supply this input; meanwhile propagate a labelled assumed permittivity interval through the same fixed-geometry optical model. Compare spectral response and inverse concentration error with a fixed-permittivity reference, holding aperture and geometry constant.
Rank 9/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 5 = max(1, 2+2+1): topic overlap 2/4, complementarity 2/3, feasible first test 1/3. Electronic structure contributes only through a material-to-optical parameter map; the material choice and reliable optical constants remain prerequisites. A bounded offline comparison is specified; required datasets and domain assumptions must still be checked.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified. Post-review scope: Electronic structure contributes only through a material-to-optical parameter map; the material choice and reliable optical constants remain prerequisites. This revised proposal awaits independent targeted re-review; simulated outcomes would establish model behavior only, not biological, clinical or deployed benefit.
Connection 10
The Pennsylvania State University
Proposed capability match for Tomer Lewi with Tak-Sing Wong: Antifouling surfaces could protect a sensor, but simulation initially addresses coating-induced optical penalties and cannot establish lubricant retention or fouling resistance.[67][68][502]
Model a putative liquid-infused protective layer as a thickness/refractive-index perturbation on a fixed metasurface. Compare the same optical sensor with and without that layer by spectral shift and sensing sensitivity, sweeping assumed layer loss and fouling thickness. Physical coating retention/contact-angle tests require coupons later; this stage tests optical compatibility only.
Rank 10/10 after semantic revision; analyst score 5 = max(1, 1+2+2): topic overlap 1/4, complementarity 2/3, feasible first test 2/3. Antifouling surfaces could protect a sensor, but simulation initially addresses coating-induced optical penalties and cannot establish lubricant retention or fouling resistance. The experiment, numerical inputs or identity/scope needs confirmation before execution.
Proposed fit, not an assertion of a new or active relationship. Independent review pending; forecast confidence low. Partner interest, capacity, data access and any required experimental approvals/resources are unverified. Post-review scope: Antifouling surfaces could protect a sensor, but simulation initially addresses coating-induced optical penalties and cannot establish lubricant retention or fouling resistance. This revised proposal awaits independent targeted re-review; simulated outcomes would establish model behavior only, not biological, clinical or deployed benefit.
Tomer Lewi has source-grounded capabilities in nanophotonics and metasurfaces, represented here by metasurface design, nanophotonics, nano-spectroscopy. [67][68]
Moderate confidenceReview: reviewedThe sources establish public professional activity, not comparative quality, future performance, or willingness to participate.
Hypothesis for 2027–2031: Tomer Lewi could explore adaptive multispectral optical edge sensor through the bounded first test described in this profile. [67][69]
Low confidenceReview: reviewedEfficiency, bandwidth, fabrication tolerance, and benefit over conventional optics remain unknown.